Generally, we tell our kids to call 911 if they ever need help. But one child took the lesson to a completely new level!
The child was experiencing problems with his homework, so he made the decision to call for help. Since 911 was the only number he knew, he took up the phone and dialed it. Is it true that the people listed on this number are ones that need help? Indeed. I think he was right someplace, too.
The operator who was answering began asking the standard questions. Following a lengthy period of miscommunication, the operator discovered that the child truly had difficulty with math problems.
The entire phone call they had is available below. We were really amused by this and laughed a lot. The YouTube video is also available at the conclusion of the article.
Operator: emergency 911
Boy: I do require assistance.
Operator: What’s wrong?
Boy: Using my arithmetic.
Operator: Using your lips?
Boy: Not using my math. I must complete it. Are you going to assist me?
Operator: Alright. What city do you reside in?
Boy: I can’t do the math.
Operator: You’re right, I understand. But where do you live?
Boy: No, I’d rather have a phone conversation with you.
Operator: I’m not able to do it. I can dispatch another person to assist you.
Boy: Alright.
Operator: What type of math problems are you having trouble with?
Boy: These are my takeaways.
Operator: You must complete the takeaways, I see.
Boy: Certainly
Operator: Okay, so what’s the issue?
Boy: I need your assistance with my math.
Operator: Alright, explain the arithmetic to me.
Boy: Alright. What is 8 minus 16?
Operator: You inform me. How much do you estimate it to be?
Boy: I have no idea, 1.
Operator: Not at all. What is your age?
Boy: I’m just four years old.
Operator: Four!
Boy: Certainly.
Operator: What’s the next issue? That was a difficult one.
Boy: Well, this one’s here. Five things to take away.
Operator: Five minus five, what do you think that is worth?
Boy: five
Female: Johnny What are you doing, exactly?
Boy: I’m getting help with my math from the policeman.
Woman: Did I mention that I was going to call you?
Operator: The mother is here.
Boy: You told me to call someone if I needed assistance.
Woman: The police aren’t who I meant!
Jim Caviezel Takes a Stand and Refuses to Work with Robert De Niro, Calling It “Awful and Ungodly
Jim Caviezel, an actor, gained notoriety when he refused to collaborate with the well-known actor Robert De Niro, referring to him as a “awful, ungodly man.” Discussions concerning how to strike a balance between one’s personal convictions and one’s business ties have been sparked by this surprising attitude in Hollywood.
This article delves into the particulars of Caviezel’s audacious choice, the motivations behind his rejection of working with De Niro, and the wider ramifications of such candid remarks in the film business. Jim Caviezel is renowned for his unwavering moral standards and strong Christian beliefs. He is best known for playing Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ.”
However, the renowned actor Robert De Niro is praised for his wide range of roles and open views on a wide range of social and political topics. Caviezel’s unwillingness to work with De Niro highlights a tension between one’s moral principles and the collaborative nature of filmmaking.
Caviezel was questioned about possible partnerships with De Niro in a recent interview. He said, “I won’t work with Robert De Niro,” with great emphasis. He is an awful, immoral individual.
His statement’s forceful wording attracted the attention of fans and the media right once, raising concerns about the details of the purported falling out between the two stars. Caviezel refrained from providing specifics throughout the conversation, but it is clear that his choice is the result of a fundamental conflict of values.
Caviezel seems to feel that there is a difference between De Niro’s public image and his previous deeds, as evidenced by his strong Christian convictions and dedication to enterprises that share his moral principles.
Caviezel’s remark was vague, which sparked rumors and increased curiosity among the general public about the underlying dynamics. In the entertainment industry, performers frequently express their thoughts on a range of topics, including their decision to avoid working with particular people.
Reactions to Caviezel’s audacious declaration, though, have been divided. Some praise him for being true to his beliefs, seeing it as an uncommon display of integrity in a field that is sometimes criticized for its moral slackness. Some argue that releasing such declarations in public is a bad idea because it can restrict one’s options for a future job and maintain divisions within the profession.
The fact that Caviezel declined to collaborate with De Niro raises more questions about how performers deal with their personal convictions in the collaborative, sometimes divisive world of Hollywood. Though traditionally varied viewpoints and expressions have been beneficial to the trade, there is a growing trend of performers imposing limitations because of their personal beliefs.
This episode illustrates how Hollywood is changing and how people are prepared to stick to their morals even when it means jeopardizing their careers. There have been instances in the entertainment business where an actor’s public remarks have helped or hurt their career. The fact that Caviezel declined to collaborate with De Niro might strike a chord with like-minded people who respect his unyielding adherence to his convictions.
Leave a Reply