Fans of Dancing with the Stars are expressing their shock over Gene Simmons using his position as a guest judge to “sexualize women.”
The 75-year-old KISS frontman, known for his larger-than-life stage presence and persona, joined the show to critique the contestants on Hair Metal Night as they danced to iconic rock anthems from the 1980s.
But audiences are now demanding the network “issue an apology” for “putting a creep on the show,” and for providing him a platform to voice his “cringe-worthy” and “sexist” comments.
On the Tuesday, October 9 episode of Dancing with the Stars, KISS rocker Gene Simmons raised quite a few eyebrows with his controversial guest appearance.
As part of the show’s Hair Metal Night, Simmons joined regular judges Carrie Ann Inaba, Derek Hough, and Bruno Tonioli to critique the celebrity dancers.
Despite the high energy of the nostalgia-filled performance set to hits like Cherry Pie and Rock You Like a Hurricane, Simmons’ sexually suggestive remarks overshadowed the night for many fans.
While his rock persona has long been associated with pushing boundaries, many felt his behavior wasn’t suited for the lighthearted nature of the competition series.
Throughout the episode, Simmons, 75, made several remarks that focused less on the dancing and more on the female dancer’s looks, which many viewers call “creepy.”
After former NFL wide receiver Danny Amendola and Witney Carson hit the dance floor, “The Demon” said he couldn’t figure out who was more “hot hot hot.”
“Danny, I’m telling you, you’re right next to somebody – one of the most beautiful women on the planet. She makes you look good. Buddy, you gotta hit the gym. You gotta get in there,” added Simmons.
And then, referring to Emma Slater who was dancing with actor Reginald VelJohnson dancer, he said: “You’ve got a beautiful woman right beside you, who can twist it and turn it, and knows how to move it and, you know, all that.”
The rock legend also had words for VelJohnson. “I wanna tell you, as a guy that’s been on the stage for half a century around the world, I’m kind of a big deal, Reggie,” Simmons said. “It’s all in the attitude and you’ve got something in that beautiful face, they love you!”
Perhaps one of his cringiest remarks was directed to actor-singer Chandler Kinney. Explaining that her moves “fogged up” his glasses, Simmons removed his dark shades and said, “You moved me, not just with your gyrations and so on, but your beautiful face and how you were into the emotion of it – top to bottom.”
He did however offer one relevant opinion to Kinney when he praised her talents, noting that she has a “big future” ahead of her.
Social media quickly filled with backlash, with many expressing their discomfort and frustration. Some viewers even went as far as to call him the “worst guest judge” in the show’s 33-season run.
“I usually like Gene Simmons and think he’s funny. But that was not the case as a guest judge. Very inappropriate and just not helpful,” writes one cyber fan on the DWTS Facebook site.
A second shares, “It was uncomfortable for us watching, can’t even imagine how the women felt. And he wasn’t scoring dances, he was just giving out random numbers.”
Gene was a bust! His comments and feedback were inappropriate along with the scores.”
A third critic adds, “His comments on all the girls was cringe!”
Another user calls Simmons “vulgar” and says he’s “the worst judge ever
Meanwhile, other online citizens are calling out ABC and Disney+, suggesting the network and streaming service apologize to fans of DWTS.
“Y’all owe the biggest apology to your fanbase (which is primarily women) & the dancers for putting that creep on your show and allowing for him to sexualize them on live TV,” one netizen writes on Facebook.
A second pens, “They need to apologize for having Gene Simmons. It was cringe-worthy. His comments were sexist, and he was just awful.”
“But they had a felon on the show this season,” adds another user, who’s referring to Anna Delvey (Sorokin), the convicted fraudster who sparked a lot of controversy with her appearance on September 17, the first episode of the DWTS season.
What do you think of DWTS decision in having Simmons as a guest judge? Please let us know what you think and then share this story so we can hear what others have to say!
Archaeologists Believe They Have Found Noah’s Ark
One of the longest-standing questions in biblical archaeology is the whereabouts of Noah’s Ark’s remnants. A massive wooden vessel known as Noah’s Ark, according to the Bible, protected Noah, his family, and pairs of every animal species from a devastating deluge that inundated the Earth approximately 5,000 years ago. Even while this myth has long been central to many theological ideologies, it has been difficult to use scientific evidence to support its historicity. Archaeologists believe they are now one step closer to confirming the resting place of Noah’s Ark, but recent discoveries have given new life to this ancient search.
This archaeological study has its core in Turkey, more precisely in the Doğubayazıt area of Ağrı, where a mysterious geological structure that resembles a boat-shaped mound has been studied since 1956. This location is consistent with the biblical story that the Ark landed on the “mountains of Ararat” in Turkey after a 150-day flood wiped out all life on Earth. With its impressive 16,500 feet of elevation, the mountain itself is shaped like an ark.
A group of specialists from Istanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Andrew University, and Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University (AİÇÜ) headed the expedition, which started in 2021 and is still going strong. The main objective of the research is to examine soil and rock samples taken from the location in an effort to find solid proof that could support the presence of Noah’s Ark.
The team took thirty samples of rock and soil fragments from the location in December 2022, and the samples were examined at the ITU laboratory. Researchers are really excited by the preliminary findings. The samples included residues of seafood along with clayey and marine elements. The findings, researchers say, clearly point to human activity at the boat-shaped mound between 3000 and 5500 BC.
Because it closely corresponds with the biblical timeline of the Great Flood, which occurred approximately 5,000 years ago, dating human activity to this era is extremely significant. To be sure that Noah’s Ark is present at this location, further thorough investigation and study are nevertheless required, according to the researchers, who are nevertheless wary.
In response to the results, AİÇÜ Vice Rector Professor Faruk Kaya said, “The initial results of the investigations indicate that human activity has been in the area since the Chalcolithic era, which occurred between 5500 and 3000 BC. We know that Prophet Noah’s flood occurred 5,000 years ago. It is also said that there was life in this area when it comes to dating. The outcomes of the lab tests demonstrated this. With the dating, it is impossible to claim that the ship is here. To make this clear, we must work for a very long time.
Although these results are fascinating, it’s important to remember that they don’t offer solid proof of Noah’s Ark’s presence. Recognizing that there is skepticism surrounding this quest, the experts on the expedition are dedicated to carrying out rigorous and exhaustive scientific examinations in order to completely validate their findings.
The geological past of Mount Ararat is one area of disagreement in the discussion of the Ark’s location. Young Earth creationist Dr. Andrew Snelling, who holds a Ph.D. from the University of Sydney, has contended that Mount Ararat cannot be the location of the Ark because the mountain formed after the floodwaters subsided. The complexity of the Noah’s Ark story and the variety of viewpoints that surround it are shown by this divergence in interpretation.
Finding Noah’s Ark is still a difficult and controversial task in the field of biblical archaeology. Some view the story skeptically, focusing on the symbolic and metaphorical elements found in religious scriptures, while others continue to ponder the alluring prospect of finding one of history’s most famous boats.
The search to verify the presence of Noah’s Ark is evidence of humanity’s never-ending curiosity with solving the secrets of our history, regardless of the conclusion of this continuous archaeological inquiry. It serves as a reminder that, despite obstacles posed by science, the quest for knowledge and comprehension is nonetheless fundamental to the human experience.
In conclusion, we are getting closer to maybe verifying the presence of Noah’s Ark thanks to the archeological dig in Turkey. By analyzing soil and rock samples, scientists have found evidence of human habitation from a time closely linked to the biblical story of the Great Flood. To be clear, more research is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Noah’s Ark was present at this location. Nevertheless, it is imperative to embrace these discoveries with cautious hope. No matter what happens, this search is a prime example of how humans have always been fascinated by solving old mysteries and examining the nexus between faith, history, and science.
Leave a Reply