Obsterscence dominates our lives and can provide long -term results, especially in our health. Patricia Clantis is a person who knows him well. Her tanning obsession has led her to internet fame, but it’s also brought her dangerously close to death with a condition called anorexia.
When Patricia was younger, tanning became an important part of her life: she would visit tanning salons five days a week and spend hours in the booths to achieve the perfect tan. This obsession intensified when she was accused of taking her 6-year-old daughter to a tanning salon and endangering her health.The incident made Patricia an internet sensation, with media outlets dubbing her “Tan Mama.” But it also shed light on the condition of tanorexia, where individuals become addicted to tanning and are unaware of just how much color they have. Health professionals warned of the dangers of excessive tanning and its link to skin cancer.
Despite the controversy, Patricia maintained her innocence, claiming that her daughter had been burned while playing outside. The charges against her were eventually dropped, but the public scrutiny took a toll on her and her family. They decided to start anew and moved to Florida.Unfortunately, Patricia’s struggles were far from over. In June 2019, she fell gravely ill due to complications from pneumonia. She was placed on life support, but thankfully, she pulled through. Today, Patricia is doing much better, although the scars from her past tanning are still visible.
In an interview, Patricia expressed that she no longer dwells on the negative aspects of her past. She has embraced her status as “Tan Mom” and even continues to tan twice a week in her own tanning bed. She sees herself as two separate people – Tan Mom, the celebrity, and Patricia Marie, the mom.The story of “Tan Mom” sparks a debate about the existence of tanning salons. Some may argue that they should be shut down due to their potential health risks, while others believe it should be a personal choice. What are your thoughts on this issue?
Regardless of where you stand on the matter, Patricia Krentcil’s journey serves as a reminder of the importance of moderation and self-awareness. Let’s be mindful of our obsessions and ensure they don’t overshadow the other crucial aspects of our lives.Please share this article with your friends and family on Facebook and let us know your thoughts in the comments below!
33 Thomas Street: The Mysterious 29-Story Windowless Skyscraper in New York. What’s it use for?
Standing tall and enigmatic in the center of Lower Manhattan is an odd 29-story skyscraper that is devoid of windows. It is situated at 33 Thomas Street and goes by the code name Titanpointe. For years, this building has puzzled New Yorkers.1.
Promotion
When the building was first completed in 1974, it was meant to contain essential telecommunications equipment and was built to resist atomic bombs. The architectural company John Carl Warnecke & Associates envisioned it as a communication nerve center that was protected from nuclear threats.
Unlike any other building in the area, this massive gray concrete and granite tower soars 550 feet into the New York skyline. It is completely dark and lacks windows, in contrast to the nearby office and residential buildings. It has an unsettling aura at night, while during the day it creates a massive shadow. Its square vents give off a subtle hum, which is frequently muffled by the sounds of the city.
For many years, New Yorkers have been fascinated with 33 Thomas Street, popularly known as the “Long Lines Building,” since it is one of the most unusual and recognizable skyscrapers in the city. However, the real function of this mysterious building has remained mostly unknown and covered up.
33 Thomas Street’s Secret
33 Thomas Street is a mysterious building with a darker side. It seems that this structure serves as more than just a communications center. Architectural drawings, information from documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, and interviews with former AT&T workers all point to 33 Thomas Street being an NSA monitoring location known as Titanpointe.
There is more to the NSA’s role than meets the eye. A significant international gateway switch that routes phone calls between the United States and other nations is located inside the structure. It is thought that these calls were intercepted by the NSA from a safe location inside the AT&T headquarters. This clandestine monitoring scheme has targeted several nations, including friends of the United States, in addition to global institutions including the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations.
Although AT&T has collaborated with the NSA on monitoring, not much is known about the precise function that locations such as 33 Thomas Street play in executing top-secret initiatives. On the other hand, the Snowden documents include hitherto unseen details on the integration of NSA hardware into AT&T’s New York City network. This integration makes clear the tools and techniques the agency uses to extract communications data from the business’s systems.
The NSA’s location inside this famous skyscraper begs the question of where the lines are drawn in terms of contemporary surveillance. “This is yet more proof that our communications service providers have become, whether willingly or unwillingly, an arm of the surveillance state,” notes Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s liberty and national security program. The idea that this kind of surveillance can be cleanly limited to non-American targets is called into question by the NSA’s extensive integration with the country’s communications infrastructure.
T&T, Security, and Law Enforcement
It is commonly known that AT&T and the NSA worked closely together. Although AT&T and the government have a long history together, it’s unknown if the NSA was utilizing AT&T’s 33 Thomas Street facility or equipment. This uncertainty prompts concerns about the scope of government monitoring inside the structure.2.
In August 2015, the New York Times and ProPublica revealed that AT&T had been praised by the NSA for its “extreme willingness to help” and had a long history of working with the agency. But neither the fresh reports nor the information leaked by Edward Snowden conclusively indicate that AT&T space or equipment was being used by the NSA. As it happens, Verizon owns the remaining portion of the 33 Thomas building, with AT&T Inc. owning the ground but only around 87 percent of the floor area.
There are important ethical and legal concerns about the NSA’s surveillance activities at 33 Thomas Street. The structure might serve as a memorial to the difficulties in maintaining proper supervision in an age of cutting-edge technology and government monitoring, as well as the delicate balance that needs to be struck between privacy and security in our globalized society.
In conclusion, 33 Thomas Street is still a famous and mysterious tower in New York City, encapsulating the secrets of contemporary monitoring as well as the history of telecommunications within its concrete walls. Its actual level of participation in government eavesdropping may never be known, but it represents the fine line that must be drawn in our connected world between security and privacy.
Leave a Reply