Rare occurrences are just that, rare. In a world where the likelihood of twins hovers around a mere 2%, and the chances of quadruplets are as slim as finding a needle in a haystack, the story of Julia defied all odds. Fourteen years ago, during her routine ultrasound, Julia received news that would change her life forever – she was carrying not one, not two, but four embryos in her womb simultaneously.
The complexity of the situation was apparent from the start. The four children were developing in the same placenta, presenting a host of potential health risks. Julia was confronted with the daunting prospect of uncertainty surrounding the health of her babies at birth. Despite recommendations to terminate the pregnancy for the sake of her own health and the presumed well-being of the children, Julia stood firm in her decision to see it through.
After a tense wait, Julia underwent a caesarean section, and to everyone’s relief, all four girls were born healthy. Though two of them initially had lower birth weights, their resilience prevailed as they quickly caught up to their counterparts. Yet, what truly captivated those around them was not merely the fact that Julia gave birth to quadruplets, but the astonishing resemblance shared by all four girls.
Their striking similarity became a hallmark of their identity, with even the closest of observers struggling to discern differences among them. From their features to their mannerisms, the girls seemed almost interchangeable. They even took to wearing identical glasses, further blurring the lines of individuality.
Despite the constant scrutiny and curiosity from others, the girls embraced their shared appearance. In fact, it became a source of pride and distinction for them. Their uncanny likeness catapulted them into the spotlight, attracting attention from various quarters, including offers for collaborations with renowned clothing brands.
Angelina Jolie’s former security guard comes out with shocking allegations against her in Brad Pitt case
According to the documents, Webb was the “head of Jolie’s security detail for two decades, and he remained in that role for approximately four years after the couple divorced.”
Webb stated that Jolie “required him and his contractors to sign NDAs relating to various personal and professional details of her, and her family’s, life.”
After the couple filed for divorce, they had a major custody battle over their six children. According to the documents, Webb claimed he “received multiple calls from Jolie’s representative, who told Mr. Webb to remind his staff that they had entered into NDAs with Jolie and that if they testified in a custody proceeding, Jolie would sue them.”
Webb said that he had conveyed the message to his contractors, and both of them confirmed that they would testify if they were to be subpoenaed.
The documents further claimed that “one of them told Webb that ‘he would testify about statements he overheard that Ms. Jolie made to the children, encouraging them to avoid spending time with Mr. Pitt during custody visits.’”
The documents also stated that the “the two security contractors both testified” despite being threated with being sued and shortly after, Mr. Webb’s company was fired by Jolie.
Webb himself does not claim to have heard Jolie’s directive instructing the children not to interact with Pitt during custody visits. He now also works for Pitt.
Jolie’s attorney, Paul Murphy has since then addressed the media over this matter. He said in a statement, “Mr. Pitt’s continued attempt to equate common NDAs for security personnel and housekeepers covering confidential information employees learn at work, with him demanding an expanded NDA to ensure the continued coverup of his deplorable actions remains shameful.” “This case is not about NDAs in general, but about power and control. All Angelina has ever wanted was separation and health, with positive relationships between all members of their family, including Mr. Pitt. She looks forward to the day when he is finally able to let her go,” the statement further read.
The latest filing comes after over a month after Jolie’s lawyer filed documents claiming that Pitt had been physically abusive toward her even before the alleged infamous plane incident of 2016. That incident, according to documents, was the final straw in asking for a divorce.
The motion that Jolie’s legal team filed in early April, most revolved around the dispute over their shares of ownership in their French winery estate, Château Miraval.
Her legal team filed a motion asking the court to compel Pitt and his legal team to provide “responses” and “documents” that explained why the actor “suddenly conditioned his purchase of Jolie’s share of Miraval on her agreeing to a greatly expanded NDA now covering Pitt’s personal misconduct, whether related to Miraval or not.”
Jolie firmly claims that this move to demand NDAs was Pitt’s attempt to “cover up” the alleged abuse against Jolie and their children.
Pitt was never charged with a crime after authorities investigated the 2016 plane incident.
In contrast to what Jolie’s legal team is saying, Pitt’s lawyers allege that it was Jolie and her team who requested a “broader” NDA.
Leave a Reply