This time, we sent an air fryer to our youngest granddaughter, the cheapest thing on her registry. Eloise called us, livid, accusing us of being cheap. I remember picking up her call and she didn’t even say hi, she just started ranting, “Seriously, Grandma? I just got your gift. An air fryer? That’s the cheapest thing you could find on my registry!”
I was taken aback because as much as the air fryer was the cheapest on their registry, I still thought it’d be useful to them, so I told her that. Eloise kept on complaining, “Useful? Come on, you know you can do better than that. Everyone knows you have the money. I just can’t believe you’d be this cheap with me. It’s embarrassing.”
In this heated moment, I told her, “Yes, you’re right. We are cheap, old, and useless. The only thing you DIDN’T know is that the day before the wedding, we were going to gift you a check for $40,000.”
I revealed this in an attempt to explain to Eloise about the cash gift we usually give our grandkids before the wedding but she was so angry at this point, that she wasn’t listening to a thing I said. I speculated that maybe she didn’t believe we would gift her such an amount of money after only buying her an air fryer.
Eventually, she said, “No, it’s clear. You just don’t love me enough to show it. You know how much pressure I’m under with the wedding. And then, this? It’s like you don’t even care,” then she hung up.
Despite my husband and I’s shock at Eloise’s reaction, we then bought her a China set, hoping to appease her, but decided against giving her the $40,000, feeling she hadn’t earned it.
Fast forward to last week. Eloise talked to her brother and found out that we were telling her the truth about the money. After confirming it with her cousins, she, called again, accusing us of discrimination, “I just found out that it’s true you gave the money to everyone else when they got married. Why didn’t I get anything?”
We stood firm, explaining our stance was due to her initial reaction, “We felt after your reaction to the wedding gift, it wasn’t right to go ahead and gift you the money.” Eloise pleaded trying to convince us otherwise, “So, you’re punishing me? Is that it? Because I was upset about an air fryer?”
I was angry that she didn’t even understand what she did wrong. “It wasn’t about the air fryer, Eloise. It was how you spoke to us, the disrespect. That’s not something we expected or can support,” I explained.
Eloise implored us, nearly in tears, “But that’s so unfair! I was stressed, Grandma. Planning a wedding is hard, and I just snapped. I didn’t mean any of it.” I felt like she should have only apologized to us instead of finding excuses to justify her behavior.
However, I told her, “We understand that it’s a stressful time, but actions and words have consequences. We hoped you’d understand the value of family and love over material things.” Full of desperation, Eloise added, “But you don’t understand! Can’t we just forget all this happened? I need that money, Grandma.”
She pleaded, threatened to boycott Christmas, and accused us of cutting her off but we didn’t budge. In the end, I expressed, “We love you very much. This has nothing to do with cutting you off. We just hope you’ll reflect on this and understand why we made our decision.”
Now, Eloise has followed up on her threat and she’s boycotting Christmas. Her mother, who is our daughter-in-law, is siding with her, calling us unreasonable. However, we feel that after all we have done for Eloise, the air fryer gift, shouldn’t have triggered this reaction.
For context, we had already paid for her college, and her parents covered her graduate school and half the wedding. Additionally, she and her husband are financially comfortable and do not desperately need our money.
We’re also not upset with our grandkids for revealing the cash gift since she is among the group of family members who are allowed to know about it. Our reason for sending the air fryer earlier was that we live far away, so we always send our gifts early.
The wedding gift is also separate from the money, which we give with the hope it will be used for something significant, like a home. Now, we feel like the action we took towards Eloise was well deserved and we are not going back on our decisions even if she and her mom threaten to do their worst.
Despite the tumultuous events and Eloise’s refusal to understand our perspective, my husband and I stand by our decision. Love and respect in our family are paramount, and we hoped this situation would be a learning experience for her.
The holidays might be quieter this year with her family’s absence, but our hope is for healing and understanding in the future. Our door and hearts remain open to Eloise, whenever she’s ready to mend fences.
Want more like this? Click here to read about a grandmother who sparked controversy online because she doesn’t bring her grandchildren gifts when she visits.
Tackling Child Trafficking: Mel Gibson’s Powerful Film, “Sound of Freedom”
Child trafficking is one of the worst issues facing modern society, causing suffering to countless innocent lives. Mel Gibson’s most recent film, “Sound of Freedom,” with its powerful message and star-studded cast, sheds light on this depressing reality. To the surprise of many, however, this important film has been overlooked by major streaming providers, raising doubts about Hollywood’s true motivations.
Disclosing the Startling Reality
“Sound of Freedom” explores the topic of child exploitation in great detail. It is based on the true story of Tim Ballard and his organization, Operation Underground Railroad. It exposes the disturbing truth that the film industry’s glitz and extravagance mask. But Hollywood doesn’t seem to want to give it the recognition it deserves.
The Hollywood Elite Is Under Investigation
Prominent figures, such as Oprah Winfrey, have been the target of allegations regarding their associations with individuals such as Harvey Weinstein and John of God. The suspicion is stoked by these claims, which suggest that the elite of Hollywood may have been complicit in the cover-up of these heinous murders. It appears that their own interests come before the safety of children who are in danger.
Taking on the Unsavory Underbelly of Hollywood
The media’s scant attention to “Sound of Freedom” serves as a sobering reminder of Hollywood’s unwillingness to confront its own dark secrets. It raises the question of whom we can truly trust in Tinseltown, the city of dreams. But Mel Gibson isn’t going to say no.
Mel Gibson Reveals His Disapproval of Secret Plans
Mel Gibson, a well-known actor and filmmaker, has fearlessly spoken out against the hidden agenda of Hollywood. His voice joins the growing chorus of individuals demanding justice and clarification for the victims of child trafficking. Through his film, he hopes to raise awareness and inspire action against this horrifying crime.
Encouraging Action Scenes in Movies
The song “Sound of Freedom” is an appeal to action for people everywhere. Gibson wants to show the power of story and cinema and encourage us to band together, take a stand, and defend the vulnerable. Together, we have the power to bring about change.
Sending a Clear Message: Protecting the Innocent
It is abundantly clear from uplifting films like “Sound of Freedom” that we will not tolerate the exploitation and abuse of children. It’s time for Hollywood to acknowledge its grim realities and prioritize the needs of the most vulnerable people of society.
Take Part in the Campaign to End Child Trafficking
Join the fight against child trafficking by speaking up. Together, we can make a difference and put a stop to this unimaginable horror. Come fight with us in the fight against child trafficking.
Leave a Reply