The whole internet collaborated to determine what this kitchen tool was.
The mixer with rotating parts was patented in 1856 by Baltimore, Maryland, tinner Ralph Collier. This was followed by E.P. Griffith’s whisk patented in England in 1857. Another hand-turned rotary egg beater was patented by J.F. and E.P. Monroe in 1859 in the US.
Their egg beater patent was one of the earliest bought up by the Dover Stamping Company, whose Dover egg beaters became a classic American brand.The term “Dover beater” was commonly in use in February 1929, as seen in this recipe from the Gazette newspaper of Cedar Rapids, IA, for “Hur-Mon Bavarian Cream,” a whipped dessert recipe featuring gelatin, whipped cream, banana and gingerale.\
The Monroe design was also manufactured in England.[4] In 1870, Turner Williams of Providence, R.I., invented another Dover egg beater model. In 1884, Willis Johnson of Cincinnati, Ohio, invented new improvements to the egg beater.
The first mixer with electric motor is thought to be the one invented by American Rufus Eastman in 1885.The Hobart Manufacturing Company was an early manufacturer of large commercial mixers,] and they say a new model introduced in 1914 played a key role in the mixer part of their business.
The Hobart KitchenAid and Sunbeam Mixmaster (first produced 1910) were two very early US brands of electric mixer.Domestic electric mixers were rarely used before the 1920s, when they were adopted more widely for home use.
In 1908 Herbert Johnston, an engineer for the Hobart Manufacturing Company, invented an electric standing mixer. His inspiration came from observing a baker mixing bread dough with a metal spoon; soon he was toying with a mechanical counterpart.
By 1915, his 20 gallon (80 L) mixer was standard equipment for most large bakeries. In 1919, Hobart introduced the Kitchen Aid Food Preparer (stand mixer) for the home.
I Want My Jobless Mom, 64, to Babysit My Kid but She Demands Payment
Natalie, a new mom with a demanding job, found herself in need of assistance and turned to her mother, Diane, for help in caring for her baby. Diane, a loving and supportive presence, readily embraced the responsibility.
As days turned into weeks, Diane’s contribution became indispensable, but a subtle tension arose when she broached the topic of compensation. Recognizing the increased demands on her time and the financial strain, Diane delicately expressed her need for financial support.
Caught off guard, Natalie grappled with the idea of compensating her mother for the help she provided. Seeking advice from an online community, she received varied perspectives on the intersection of family support and monetary remuneration.
The discussions highlighted the complexities of familial dynamics, with some advocating for compensation as recognition of the significant commitment involved in caregiving. Others emphasized the unconditional support of family, transcending financial exchanges.
In reflecting on the discourse, Natalie realized that while monetary compensation was one form of appreciation, the true value lay in the bond between mother and daughter. Choosing to express her gratitude through heartfelt gestures, Natalie aimed to honor the immeasurable support her mother provided during a critical time, bridging the gap with gestures that transcended mere financial transactions.
Leave a Reply